Written by Paul Brown | Last updated 17.11.2025 | 13 minute read
Modernising core banking platforms has shifted from being a long-term ambition to an urgent necessity. Incumbent banks face pressure from digital-first challengers, tightening regulation, and customers who expect seamless, always-on experiences. At the same time, the economics of running ageing mainframes, inflexible monoliths and fragmented satellite systems are becoming increasingly difficult to justify. Cloud-native infrastructure – built on microservices, containers and automated pipelines – offers a way out of this bind, but the journey from legacy core to modern platform is fraught with technical, regulatory and organisational risk.
This is where fintech consultancies have carved out a distinctive role. They act as translators between cloud engineering, banking regulation and commercial strategy, helping institutions move beyond tactical cloud hosting towards genuine cloud-native core banking modernisation. Rather than simply implementing technology, these firms orchestrate multi-year transformations that rewire a bank’s operating model, risk posture and product development capabilities.
The approaches leading consultancies take share common patterns but must be tailored to the bank’s starting point, regulatory context and appetite for change. Understanding those patterns is invaluable for executives seeking to turn a modernisation mandate into a pragmatic, value-focused roadmap.
Any credible consultancy engagement begins with the “why”. Cloud-native core banking modernisation is capital-intensive, politically sensitive and highly visible to regulators. Without a clear and shared rationale, programmes drift into technical experiments that never scale beyond a handful of use cases. Fintech consultancies therefore ground the conversation in business outcomes: faster product launches, lower cost-to-income ratios, improved resilience, stronger control over data and the ability to participate in open banking ecosystems.
Legacy core banking systems were designed for a very different environment: batch processing, branch-centric distribution, and limited integration with third parties. They tend to be monolithic, with business logic tightly coupled to specific channels and products. As a result, even small changes – a new pricing rule, a different repayment schedule, an additional data field – can require risky code modifications, lengthy regression testing and weekend outages. Cloud-native architectures invert this logic by decomposing capabilities into small, independently deployable services, enabling teams to ship changes rapidly while isolating risk.
Fintech consultancies help banks articulate the cost of inaction. They quantify technical debt in financial terms: lost revenue from delayed product launches, operational losses from outages, and the opportunity cost of data trapped in siloed systems. They benchmark time-to-market and resilience against digital challengers and fintech partnerships. This evidence provides the commercial foundation for investment cases, transforming “IT modernisation” into a strategic enabler of growth and regulatory compliance.
There is also a geopolitical and regulatory dimension. Supervisors now view concentration risk in cloud and other critical third parties as a systemic issue, and are tightening expectations around operational resilience, exit planning and third-party risk management. A modern, cloud-native core is not simply about shifting workloads to a hyperscaler; it is about designing an architecture and operating model that can satisfy demanding regulators while still enabling innovation. Fintech consultancies ensure that these regulatory expectations are baked into modernisation strategies from day one, rather than bolted on at the end.
Once the strategic case is established, consultancies turn to architecture. A recurring mistake is to treat the cloud as a remote data centre: lifting and shifting an entire core stack into virtual machines without changing the application architecture or operating model. Fintech consultancies aim explicitly for “cloud-native” rather than “cloud-hosted”: systems designed to exploit elasticity, automation, and composability from the outset.
They typically start with domain-driven design. Rather than mirroring internal departments or existing product lines, architects and business stakeholders collaborate to model enduring business domains: accounts, payments, lending, customer information, pricing, fraud, limits management, and so on. Each domain becomes a candidate bounded context for microservices and data ownership. This ensures that services map to stable business concepts rather than transient organisational structures, reducing coupling and making future change easier to manage.
Cloud-native core banking architectures designed by fintech consultancies tend to revolve around a few core principles:
Fintech consultancies also help banks choose between building a bespoke cloud-native core, customising a modern core banking SaaS platform, or adopting a hybrid approach where a vendor core is wrapped in bank-specific microservices. The decision depends on how differentiated the bank wants its core products to be, the maturity of target platforms, and regulatory considerations such as data residency and control over critical functions. Vendor selection is therefore not just a procurement exercise; it becomes part of the architectural strategy.
Data architecture is another area where consultancies add significant value. In a cloud-native setup, operational data, analytical data and regulatory reporting data should not be three separate worlds. By designing a layered data platform – with streaming ingestion, normalised operational stores and governed data products – they allow the bank to leverage real-time insight for risk, fraud, personalisation and regulatory reporting without duplicating every feed three times. This becomes particularly powerful when combined with open banking and embedded finance, where transaction data can drive personalised offers and risk decisions in near real time.
Finally, fintech consultancies focus on the human side of architecture. A well-designed cloud-native core is of limited value if release processes remain manual, if change advisory boards still meet once a month, or if separate teams own infrastructure, security and applications. Many firms therefore adopt platform engineering and product-centric delivery models: cross-functional squads own domains end-to-end, supported by central platform teams that provide shared capabilities such as logging, authentication and observability. The consultancy’s role is to shape this target operating model and coach teams through the transition.
Designing a target architecture is relatively straightforward compared with the challenge of getting there. The biggest risk in core banking modernisation is an over-ambitious “big bang” cutover from old to new. Many banks have learnt the hard way that replacing a decades-old core in one weekend is risky, hugely complex, and often politically untenable. Fintech consultancies therefore favour progressive migration patterns that reduce risk while still delivering tangible benefits along the way.
One widely used pattern is the so-called “strangler fig” approach. Rather than replacing the entire core, the bank introduces a modern architecture around the legacy system and gradually routes specific journeys and products to cloud-native services. A façade layer – often an API gateway and event bus – sits between channels and the old core. New microservices intercept requests, handle modernised functionality, and call into the legacy system only when necessary. Over time, more and more capabilities are implemented in the new stack until the old core is sufficiently “hollowed out” to be retired.
Fintech consultancies help banks decide which domains to strangle first. Typical candidates include high-change areas where innovation is constrained by the legacy core, such as onboarding, customer data, digital wallets or specific lending products. By starting at the “edges” of the core and working inwards, they can improve customer experience quickly while building out reusable components – identity, payments orchestration, limits management – that will underpin later phases. Critically, they design migration paths at the level of journeys and data flows, not just technology components.
Data migration and synchronisation are central design concerns. During a multi-year coexistence period, the bank may need customer, account and transaction data to remain consistent across both legacy and cloud-native systems. Consultancies often employ event streaming and change data capture to keep systems in sync, minimising the need for overnight batch reconciliations. They design patterns for dual-writing, reconciliation dashboards and automated exception handling, recognising that operational teams will need clear visibility of which system is the “system of record” for each domain at each point in time.
Alongside strangler patterns, consultancies may recommend modular replacement for specific domains – for example, moving cards or payments to a specialist cloud-native platform while leaving current accounts on the legacy core for the time being. In some cases, particularly for new digital-only brands or greenfield entities, they may propose a parallel bank strategy: launching a new institution on a cloud-native stack and gradually migrating or re-booking customers from the incumbent core. Each pattern carries different levels of complexity, regulatory scrutiny and cultural impact; choosing the right mix is one of the most important strategic calls in any programme.
A final, often underestimated aspect of migration is testing and operational rehearsal. Fintech consultancies bring expertise in automated testing, synthetic transaction generation and chaos engineering to validate cloud-native cores under stress and failure scenarios. They help design controlled pilots, ring-fenced customer cohorts and dark-launch strategies where new services run in parallel in production without yet being the primary system of record. This reduces cutover risk and provides evidence to regulators that resilience has been thoroughly tested before critical workloads are moved.
Cloud-native modernisation unfolds in a dense regulatory environment. Supervisors expect banks to understand and manage the risks of outsourcing critical services to hyperscalers and other third parties, while maintaining clear accountability for customer outcomes and financial stability. Fintech consultancies, particularly those steeped in banking regulation, treat governance and risk as first-class design concerns rather than a compliance afterthought.
At a minimum, any cloud-native core banking programme must align with outsourcing and operational resilience requirements. That includes robust due diligence on cloud service providers, clear exit strategies, audit rights, data residency controls, and well-defined responsibilities under the shared responsibility model. Consultancies help banks translate high-level regulatory texts into concrete control frameworks, policies and technical guardrails that engineering teams can implement without constant legal interpretation.
Typical areas where consultancies focus their governance support include:
Regulators are increasingly alert to the systemic implications of concentration in the cloud market. In the UK and Europe, new regimes for critical third parties and digital operational resilience are reshaping expectations of both banks and cloud providers. Fintech consultancies help institutions engage constructively with supervisors on these topics, demonstrating how their cloud-native architectures improve resilience through multi-region deployments, automated failover and granular observability – rather than simply moving single points of failure into someone else’s data centre.
A sophisticated governance model also recognises the trade-off between central control and empowerment of product teams. Too much centralisation and every microservice deployment becomes a mini-regulatory approval process; too little and the bank risks fragmentation of controls and inconsistent security postures. Consultancy-led programmes therefore emphasise “guardrails not gates”: policies and platform-level controls that enforce minimum standards while allowing teams to move quickly within those boundaries. Examples include centrally maintained security baselines for Kubernetes clusters, approved patterns for secrets management, and mandatory logging standards enforced via shared libraries.
Finally, consultancies ensure that modernisation enhances, rather than undermines, risk and finance functions. A cloud-native core can provide richer, more granular data on exposures, liquidity, and customer behaviour, available intra-day or in near real time. By including risk, compliance and finance stakeholders in the design of the data platform and reporting architecture, they turn the regulatory burden into a competitive advantage: faster, more accurate insight into the bank’s risk profile and performance, supporting both prudential reporting and management decision-making.
Perhaps the most important contribution fintech consultancies make is to frame core banking modernisation as an ongoing capability rather than a one-off project. Technology, regulation and customer expectations will continue to evolve; a cloud-native core must therefore be capable of continuous adaptation. A static three-year programme plan is rarely sufficient. Instead, consultancies work with banks to build a living roadmap that links architectural evolution to business priorities and measurable outcomes.
The starting point is usually a candid assessment of the bank’s current state across architecture, operating model, skills, culture and regulatory posture. From this baseline, consultancies help executives define a small number of ambitious but concrete objectives: for example, reducing time-to-market for new current account features from months to weeks, cutting unplanned outages by a set percentage, or enabling partnership integration in days rather than months. These objectives become the North Star against which modernisation initiatives are prioritised.
Rather than attempting to transform everything at once, successful roadmaps sequence change into coherent waves. Early waves often target domains that create visible customer impact and internal momentum – such as digital onboarding, personalised offers or real-time notifications – while simultaneously laying foundational capabilities like an API gateway, central identity service and cloud landing zone. Later waves tackle deeper core functions such as deposits, lending, or treasury, once the organisation has built confidence in cloud-native delivery and governance.
Crucially, consultancies encourage banks to adopt product-centric funding and governance models. Instead of funding monolithic programmes with fixed end dates, they advocate investment in enduring product lines and platforms with rolling backlogs, KPIs and accountability for outcomes. This aligns incentives better with a cloud-native world where value comes from continuous improvement, experimentation and rapid feedback loops. It also reduces the risk of transformation fatigue: teams see modernisation as part of their everyday work rather than a massive project that may or may not be renewed.
Continuous modernisation also depends on skills and culture. Moving to cloud-native infrastructure requires engineers comfortable with automation, observability, and distributed systems; risk and compliance professionals who understand cloud controls; and leadership that is willing to tolerate controlled experimentation. Fintech consultancies therefore invest heavily in knowledge transfer: pairing their experts with internal teams, running hands-on labs and simulations, and helping HR and learning functions update role profiles and career paths. The goal is for the bank to own and evolve its modern core long after the consultancy has left.
In the end, the most successful core banking modernisation journeys share a common pattern. They start with a compelling strategic rationale and a sober appreciation of risk. They combine bold architectural vision with pragmatic migration patterns. They embed governance and regulatory alignment from the outset, rather than treating them as a brake on innovation. And they build an organisational muscle for continuous change, turning cloud-native infrastructure from a technical buzzword into a durable source of competitive advantage.
For banks willing to engage with this challenge, fintech consultancies are not just implementation partners; they are guides through a complex, multi-year transformation. By blending deep domain knowledge, cloud engineering expertise and regulatory understanding, they help institutions modernise their core banking systems in ways that are safe, sustainable and genuinely value-creating – unlocking the full potential of cloud-native infrastructure in the service of customers, shareholders and regulators alike.
Is your team looking for help with Fintech consultancy? Click the button below.
Get in touch